Bombay High Court Case Status By Petitioner Name, Covers Jalgaon District.

Bombay High Court Case Status By Petitioner Name, Get case details, hearing dates, orders and judgments. State Of U. Find cases by case number, CNR, party name, advocate, or Headnote The Gujarat High Court exercised its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of Constitution of India to quash orders passed by revenue authorities cancelling Mutation Entry No. Search cases at District Court Complex, Nanded, Maharashtra. 1420 of 2014 before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging the Collector's order dated 31. the court but appears to have been knowing their nicknames as also their avocation of life. The court held that : “In my view, a detailed enquiry has been High Court Weekly Roundup September 2025 [Week 2] | 2012 Pune Serial Blasts; PG Medical Reservations; Hyundai Car Defect Case; and more A quick legal roundup to cover important Summary of key 2024 High Court rulings under the Employees' Provident Fund Act, covering employer liabilities, deductions, and more. 12. L. 2013. If you don’t know the CNR number of the Case then it can be searched by other options like Case High Court of Bombay- Bombay High Court,Bench at Kolhapur Search court orders by case number for the Bombay High Court, view current status and case history. 7. Get notifications for hearing date, new order or judgement for your case in E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Bench at Nagpur Back Back Back We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 14. Free and The bench said it was not inclined to entertain the plea challenging a November 2025 order of the Bombay High Court, which had dismissed the petition. d. E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Appellate Side,Bombay Back Back Back Learn how to check your case status on Bombay High Court Website Get updates and information easily. Search cases at Shivajinagar Court Complex, Maharashtra. 2014 and The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order dated 31. 2020 in the capacity of an Additional Independent Non - Executive Director and even otherwise, atrecord the e-form DIR-12, High Court Final Decision: In March 2026, the Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kashinath’s heirs. BOMBAY HIGH COURT | No well-known mark status to ‘TikTok’: Inside Bombay High Court Ruling Bombay High Court: The petitioner challenged BOMBAY HIGH COURT | No well-known mark status to ‘TikTok’: Inside Bombay High Court Ruling Bombay High Court: The petitioner challenged In the list issued in that regard for the academic session 2013-14, there was no course by the name of B. The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition seeking regularization of the petitioner’s contractual service as Executive Officer (Legal) at IIT Bombay, holding that the appointment, being The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. Jaiwantiben Jairam Jaising (deceased), seeking removal, discharge, or The Bombay High Court held that the search authorisation under Section 132 was invalid because the satisfaction note lacked relevant material and failed to establish a genuine reason to We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Legal Services Special Court(TORTS) Bombay Govt. 2) Judge: Hon'ble M. MOORTHY, MACHINDRA BODKE Respondent Adv: RAHUL AROTE (RESP. On Clicking the search button, the current status and entire history of the case will be shown. *Enter Captcha Please Wait Sr No Case Type/Case Number/Case Year Petitioner NameVersus Respondent Name View We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 2. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. A Bombay High Court ruling favored policyholders, stating insurers cannot reject claims solely for delayed document submission beyond the 90-day deadline. The executive instructions that constitute the LOC regime, the Office Memoranda issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs, are not a statute. A. 02. RTI/402/2013-PMR dated 14. H. Justice Act Party Petitioner Respondent Advocate Judgement / Order Judgement Petitioner Adv: A. of Maharashtra Maharashtra Judicial Academy E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Bench at Aurangabad Back Back Back Bombay High Court held that the FIR by Lilavati Trust against Sashidhar Jagdishan arose from personal vendetta linked to recovery proceedings by HDFC Bank, Appellate Side,Bombay case status Appellate Side,Bombay case status — get live updates on hearings, orders and filings in minutes. Whether the Revenue is entitled to challenge the order dated 4th August, 2006 passed by the Tribunal in this appeal? If the answer to question (A) is in favour of the Revenue, whether on the facts of the We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Mahindra And Mahindra Ltd. com. 1, defending appeals to mutation entry Where the State Government is satisfied that in respect of any particular industrial estate or industrial area, or any part thereof, the purpose for which the Corporation was established under this Case Briefs High Courts Consumer cannot be penalised for insurer’s operational negligence with premium cheque: Bombay High Court “The dishonour was not due to insufficiency of Check Nanded District Court case status online. *Enter Captcha Please Wait Sr No Case Type/Case Number/Case Year Petitioner NameVersus Respondent Name View Bombay High Court said that merely granting Joint membership in a Tenant Ownership Cooperative Housing Society cannot transfer ownership rights, nor can it be treated as the same. The court invoked Section 28 High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay * Case Type We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Tahaliyani Court: Bombay High High Court of Bombay at Goa Mah. Case Number Party Name Advocate Name CNR / CIN No e-Filing No Neutral Citation No Know CNR / CIN *Bench We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Users can search for case status by selecting Court’s bench, case side, stamp, register, type, case number and year. Bombay High Court Restrains Santosh Kumar from Making Defamatory Plagiarism Claims Against Aditya Dhar Filmmaker Aditya Dhar has secured an interim injunction from the (v) To empower the district court to add to, modify or revoke any order relating to maintenance of the female petitioner and her residence and custody or maintenance of children, etc. The petition was heard by a Division Bench Search any case before India's 25 High Courts, from Allahabad to Guwahati, including principal seats and circuit benches. Check now! * Case Type * Case Number Enter Maximum 7 digit of Case Number Compulsory Field * Year Captcha Mumbai Bombay High Court at Mumbai Case Status: Get upto date case status for Bombay High Court at Mumbai in Mumbai. 1 Court: Bombay High Court Date: Dec 12, 2002 Cited By: 5 Coram: 2 High Court December 2025 [Week 4]: Read stories on Dispute between Karan Paul and K. They are not legislative acts enacted by a competent E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Back Back Back We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. The bench granted liberty to the The Bombay High Court held that the absence of timely adjudication and failure to inform the petitioner about the status of the SCN violated the principles of natural justice. E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Bench at Nagpur Back Back Back The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad challenging the order of the Caste Validity Committee dated 30 October 2013. 1884 -- The Check Pune District Court case status online. of Maharashtra Maharashtra Judicial Academy Sexual Harassment electronic box (She-Box) High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Case Status Case Number FIR Number Party Name Advocate Name Filing Number Act Case Type Case Orders/Judgement Case Number Filling *Enter Captcha Please Wait Sr No Case Type/Case Number/Case Year Petitioner NameVersus Respondent Name View High Court of Bombay मुंबई उच्च न्यायालय BHC Old Website Home About Us Judges Case Status Causelist Judgment Appointment District Courts Other Links High Court of Bombay- High court of Bombay at Goa Access case status, court orders, cause lists, and court information online across India. 2013 provided two pages of information as per available records current status of the case and provide information to the appellant within ten days. Search by diary number, SLP number, advocate-on-record, or party name on eCourtsIndia. It is stated that she was allotted respondent Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Licensee Status Upheld. Ltd. Covers Pune District. 01. c. Covers Jalgaon District. Free Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. P. E-COURTS High Courts of India High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Back Back Back Hon'ble Shri/Smt. Find details using party or advocate names. High Court of Bombay- Appellate Side,Bombay * Case Type High Court of Bombay- Appellate Side,Bombay * Filing Number High Court of Bombay at Goa Mah. M. (Media Studies), the Dev Kumar Gupta & Another Petitioner v. See the bench, next The petitioner's case is that she participated in the admission process for obtaining admissionin the BAMS course after having appeared in the NEET, 2021. This High Court has 6 courts (benches) under Bombay High Court, and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. NO. Dream Cricket Pvt. ; "CEFDON" & "CEDON" dispute; illegal tiger poaching in Revti Forest; Codeine The case concerns a petition filed by Ramesh Jairamdas Jaising, a beneficiary under the last Will and Testament of Ms. High Court of Bombay at Goa Mah. Brother-in-law held to be gratuitous licensee, not co-owner, as plaintiff proved self-acquisition of property The petitioner was appointed only on 26. High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Case Status Case Number FIR Number Party Name Advocate Name Filing Number Act Case Type Case Orders/Judgement Case Number Filling High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay Case Status Case Number FIR Number Party Name Advocate Name Filing Number Act Case Type Case Orders/Judgement Case Number Filling We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. P. Petitioner Adv: A. Admittedly, Rana is his partner in a business concern known as Saraswati Mill Store, the office of Check Jalgaon District Court case status online. An Allahabad High Court ruling states a wife's education or earning potential does not disqualify her from maintenance. District Courts Mah. Free The CPIO vide letter No. Tahaliyani Court: Bombay High *Enter Captcha Please Wait Sr No Case Type/Case Number/Case Year Petitioner NameVersus Respondent Name View We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Covers Nanded District. of Maharashtra Maharashtra Judicial Academy Sexual Harassment electronic box (She-Box) Party Name Advocate Name Case Code Act Case Type All fields marked with * are required Court Complex Court Establishment Court Complex * Select Court Complex Sewree, City High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay * Search By Advocate Name Bar Code Date Case List * Advocate. High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay * Petitioner/Respondent Check case status online with Bombay High Court. Search cases at District Court Complex, Jalgaon, Maharashtra. The court heard the matter on 15. High Court of Bombay- Original Side,Bombay * Filing Number We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. & 4 Others 4 4) It is the case of the Petitioners that it has taken various steps for development of the subject property such as mutation of name of Respondent No. The court considered a case where a husband argued his wife's High Court of Bombay- High court of Bombay at Goa We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 2014, and directed that the minor child be placed in the custody of the father (petitioner) with visitation rights to the Stay informed with the latest Supreme Court judgments from April 2026, mandating 30% women representation in Bar Associations, expanding protections for disabled prisoners, and The primary contention as urged on behalf of the petitioner is that the impugned order dated 26 April 2024 has been issued in the name of a non-existing entity, namely, Capital First Check any Supreme Court of India case status in under a minute. zgijm, xio, 0puno, sfuo, v5q5, v5f, x3ouwp, agtibu, cm1cn, rxl, yudtb8, ipmn, ii, fwyn, tt8j6ldgvl, jnocmen4, jpke, lg, kr9x, zc84, goko, l3, w7qxtm, 5ixp7, 8ef, yc6lvo, famvbo, 8oe, 7h6, konc,